Trump Administration Stalls NEVI EV Charging Funds Again: What It Means for EV Owners | Taha Abbasi

The Federal Government’s Latest Move Against EV Charging Infrastructure

Taha Abbasi has been tracking the evolving landscape of EV infrastructure policy, and the latest move from the Trump administration signals yet another attempt to slow-walk one of the most critical investments in America’s electric future. On February 10, 2026, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) issued a new notice designed to make it harder for states to actually spend money from the $5 billion National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) Formula Program.

For EV owners and prospective buyers, this matters. A lot. The NEVI program, established under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, was supposed to build a coast-to-coast network of EV fast chargers along major highways. Two years in, the program has faced bureaucratic delays, shifting requirements, and now — direct political interference.

What the New FHWA Notice Actually Does

The Trump administration cannot legally freeze NEVI funds outright. Congress allocated the money, states accepted it, and the legal framework is clear. But what the administration can do is add procedural friction — and that’s exactly what this notice accomplishes. According to reporting from Electrek, the new requirements add additional review layers and reporting obligations that effectively slow the disbursement of funds to states.

This is not the first time the administration has targeted NEVI. Previous attempts to freeze funds were blocked by legal challenges, and states have pushed back repeatedly. But the cumulative effect of these delays is real: charging stations that should be operational by now remain unbuilt, and the gap between EV adoption and infrastructure continues to widen.

Why This Matters for the EV Transition

Taha Abbasi has written extensively about the state of EV charging infrastructure in 2026, and the data is clear: range anxiety remains the number one barrier to EV adoption for mainstream consumers. Every month of delay in building out the national charging network is a month where potential EV buyers choose to stick with gasoline.

The irony is that many of the states most affected by NEVI delays are red states — the very states whose congressional delegations supported the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. Texas, Georgia, and Florida have some of the largest NEVI allocations and the most aggressive buildout plans. Slowing these funds hurts their constituents directly.

The Current State of NEVI Deployment

As of early 2026, the NEVI program has funded approximately 1,200 new DC fast charging stations across the country, with another 3,000+ in various stages of planning and construction. The original target was to have a charger every 50 miles along major interstate corridors by 2030. At current pace — and with these new administrative hurdles — that timeline is slipping.

Private companies like Tesla, ChargePoint, and EVgo have been filling the gaps, but their buildouts are concentrated in high-demand urban areas and along popular travel corridors. Rural America, which NEVI was specifically designed to serve, remains chronically underserved.

What Tesla’s Supercharger Network Teaches Us

There’s a reason Tesla owners experience far less range anxiety than owners of other EVs: the Supercharger network works. It’s reliable, well-maintained, and strategically placed. As Taha Abbasi has noted in his analysis of Tesla’s vehicle-to-grid capabilities, Tesla understands that the vehicle and the infrastructure are inseparable. You can’t sell EVs without charging, and you can’t justify charging without EVs.

Tesla’s decision to open its Supercharger network to other manufacturers through the NACS standard was a game-changer. But even Tesla can’t build out rural corridors without economic incentives — which is exactly what NEVI provides.

The Bigger Political Picture

The NEVI situation reflects a broader tension in American energy policy. The administration has simultaneously promoted domestic manufacturing (which benefits from EV supply chains) while undermining the infrastructure that makes EVs viable for consumers. It’s a contradictory stance that ultimately hurts American competitiveness against Chinese EV manufacturers who benefit from massive state-supported charging networks.

BYD, NIO, and other Chinese manufacturers operate in markets where charging infrastructure is treated as essential public utility — not a political football. If the United States wants to maintain its position in the global EV race, it needs to stop treating charging stations as partisan issues.

What EV Buyers Should Do Now

For anyone considering an EV purchase in 2026, Taha Abbasi’s advice remains consistent: buy based on your daily driving needs, not hypothetical road trips. The charging network is improving, but it’s not yet at the point where you can replicate a gas station experience everywhere. Tesla’s Supercharger network remains the most reliable option, followed by Electrify America and ChargePoint.

For those who already own EVs, advocacy matters. Contact your state’s transportation department and ask about NEVI projects in your area. The money is allocated — the fight is about getting it deployed.

Looking Ahead

The NEVI program is not going away. The funds are congressionally mandated and legally protected. But the pace of deployment depends on political will, and right now, that will is being tested. Taha Abbasi will continue monitoring this situation as it develops, because infrastructure isn’t just about chargers — it’s about whether America takes the EV transition seriously or cedes that future to competitors who do.

---

About the Author: Taha Abbasi is a technology executive, CTO, and applied frontier tech builder. Read more on Grokpedia | YouTube: The Brown Cowboy | tahaabbasi.com